How To: Make A Killer Presentation

My family members motioned each other to sit down on the unoccupied chairs, strapped with silk ribbons. The atmosphere was glittered with countless number of decorations, that it resembled a wedding dinner rather than the "Internet Studying Program" orientation that we were attending. I stared down at my watch, glancing sideways at the door - waiting for the presenter to enter. The orientation took thirty minutes to begin and once it begun, my parents were snoring already. Sister tilted her head downwards as she scrolled through her Facebook news feeds.

Personally, I don't blame my family members for losing interest on the orientation minutes into it. The presenter was late. He distributed ten pages of notes - filled with obvious marketing techniques to blind parents into getting the system fixed in their homes. He used PowerPoint to a height where he was basically reading he everything he wrote on use slides. He diverted from his topic so much that he started with The Program's Manuals and ended on his personal experiences at the equity market. That was five years ago.

Has this ever occurred to you? Great! So, please use this horrid experience to avoid any similarities to your presentations.

Therefore, how to make a Killer Presentation?

STEP ONE - Planning 

• Choose your topic wisely. 

              Honestly, everyone tend to make great mistakes here. Students or presenters -when given option to choose topic from- will often choose the easiest and the most presentable topic. For example, "how to save environment" over "Should gay marriages be allowed?". Remember, easy topics are often general issues or widely acknowledged fields. General points of discussions leads to lack of participation, response or interest from listeners.

•  Research on your topic 

              A presenter or a person with outstanding oral presentations skills would at least spend an hour researching facts, fun facts, theories, conspiracies, details, whys, hows, and whats about the topic of discussion. Researching more leads to greater understanding of the topic of discussion. This does not only lead to a higher confidence when presenting the topic, but also enables you to answer questions if asked by the listeners.

•  Practice your talk

            Spontaneous talk can have two pathways; pure understanding of topic or complete utter garbage. Though a little ability to converse and bullshit is widely welcomed. Never ever think you could make through an entire talk just by blundering everything you know, especially if you're presenting on a formal event. Draft your points into written format and allow yourself to create your presentation. Once done, practice the same presentation for at least ten times. Practice in front of your family members, mirror or even your goldfish (you might get a smart goldfish at the end of the day).

• Have your presentation unfold logically                                                                         I've seen horrid presentations by cocky people who assume that they can spontaneously make a presentations out of thin air. Utter crap - that's what I listened to. That's because their points are not organised and arranged according to system and the points just pop out anytime because the brainstorming sessions occur halfway through the presentation. Listen, just like every story, your presentation should contain three segments - opening, action and an ending. Opening should include your topic and and an overview of it. The ending should briefly state the general points and bang!

Step Two - Presenting.

• Get Biased - don't overdo it.

         Not many how-to-dos would include this point. This is a complete secret - not completely a secret. A general opinion is always safe but it isn't the food-for-thoughts. A biased or a provocative point can lead to multiple perceptions of the topic. For example, you could always ask a question, keeping in mind that it should be biased.

• Make contact with the audiences

         Remember, you're not the only one out there. The whole presentation is a general concept of you interacting with your audiences, with time accumulating their interest to the main topic of yours. Ask the audiences questions to make sure they are listening to your presentations. Make loads of eye contact, not towards one specific person - that's creepy. Make eye contacts with everyone in the room. Be mobile, move around. Make countless hand movements and gesture - this leads to audiences believing you really know whatever shit you're talking about.

• Be Confident

            I was told by my friend once, Sam, that I look like I'm having the time of my life whenever I'm involved in public speaking. I told her, "trust me, I'm as nervous as you are. I just hid it well." The Truth. The inconvenient truth is that everyone performing would feel nervous and those who looked to be brimming with confidence are just hiding it well. Avoid looking down on the floor or out of the windows.

•  Presentation Tool

          Here's a thing. Presentation tool are just a medium to create better understanding of the topic in the audiences mind. It is not the decisive factor in your presentation. Regardless of how many props, presentation slides and materials you use, the only thing that would matter is your presentation methods. However, if your presentations skills are great, then additional tools would fit in fine.

• Bullet points kills (bullets - duh)

        We all have been told that the mind could only concentrate on one at a time. Yes, 90% of the society can only or - choose - to focus on one thing at time. Long detailed and organised bullet points requires a hard long time to read and the audiences also have to listen to your perceptions and presentation of the points. So tell me, which one would they choose? It is however, still fine, to do bullet points. My opinion is that it is highly sagacious to only include two bullet points per slide. Each slide should only cover one sub topic. In that way, you could also keep track of your presentation.

Perhaps, that's all. 

Remember, public speaking skills don't develop in one night. Don't give up if you have made horrible presentations. I've made loads of horrible presentations that made my friends giggle at the back of the class before.

And, last but not least, as my friend told me that my presentation skills aren't goddess perfect either.

Folks, you don't need a perfect presentation skill to teach others to confront their problems. All you need it a heart to help and a little knowledge.

P.S. Lots of love.

TJ.

Why Manchester United Will Rise

You might have noticed it from the title itself. Yes, I am an Old Trafford faithful. Ever since I started watching football, I knew I was going to support Manchester United. Never occurred to me though, why? Why would I choose Manchester United at times when Chelsea and City looked dominant? Why would I believe United at times when Barcelona and Madrid triumphed in Europe? 

Nevertheless, cutting to the bone of contention, I am a realistic person and I believe that Manchester United will rise and triumph again despite the ongoing crisis in Old Trafford. Rare, yes.

If you have known Premier League long enough or even before it was even established, one thing was certain. Liverpool was the king before 90/91. And look at the records after that. They reached some of their lowest point. I agree, the Champions League finals in 2005 and 2007 did shed glitters of hope and success but no Liverpool fan can hide that that wasn't the Liverpool that should've have been. And now, every football fan believe that such would occur to United. Nope.

Simply, because our wealth and history is there to conceal any cripples and wrinkles present. Woodward might have been horrible at signing players but he definitely got more sponsorship deals to United than any club could've imagined. Bleacher Report identified Manchester United and Barcelona of Spain as the most influential football club in the world, thanks of course to our wealthy sponsorship deals. Money is never a question.

United fans have never forgot to spin the wheel and blame on the American Owners, the Glazers. Look here, I'm not defending them and I, too, feel angry at Glazers for robbing from us for their own deprived times. At the end of this season, I believe funds will be provided to Moyes to make himself count. The sad thing is I predict there will be only one or no signing during this Winter transfer window. Why? Why, well, because we're Manchester United.

Manchester United are one of the very rare list of clubs that still buys players that they see as a long term product at the club. Crisis moulded and panic signings aren't fruitful, we all know that. We-fans-are just desperate to see new faces and hopes at United. Believe it or not, one potential signing can change your season. The Ozil-Arsenal effect anybody? And there are no players out there that can fit into the long term conditions; excluding Herrera of Bilbao and Koke of Madrid. Both are having the time of their lives at this season and selling them at Winter is pure stupidity for any club. Rumours regarding Pogba, Vidal? C'mon. Only Marchisio seems possible, yes but only at the coming summer transfer window.

Moyes, for me is an excellent inch-by-inch Fergie replica, which is the reason why Fergie chose him. His temper, taciturn and calm ethiques at conferences, hardworking ethic, faith in youth and ability to succeed with such low funds is what earned him a move to United. Many United fans were quick to dismiss him and blame him for losses and draws. From my own opinion, the only two faults he did and is still doing is; sacking the entire back room staff and playing Kagawa on your left. 70% of the crisis is due to Woodward's lack of signings and a weakened yet well concealed squad left by Ferguson.

So, to all Old Trafford faithfuls, I would like to say this; 

Give the club sometime and we will rise. Not because of some summer signing or luck, but because we're Manchester United and we'll rise. We always do.

TJ.

Somebody Has To Say It #2: Having A Crush is Totally Depressing

Thesaurus defined crush as "to break, pound or grind into small fragments or powder"; "a usual temporary infatuation." Either way, the end product is always similar, broken. 

Deeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeppp. Gosh, I get it. Moving along.

Frankly, having a crush on someone isn't always depressing. What's depressing is that it remains as a crush forever. We all are aware of the love cycle; strangers, crush/friends, love. Yes, but this isn't just an ordinary Barbie tale. This is life. We all have wandered into our classrooms, workplace or even campus, peering and glancing quickly at one specific person. We sigh and chant questions subconsciously, why isn't that person mine yet? or why can't I muster enough courage and boldness to tell the person about my feelings for them?

Why? Because we all are afraid of being crushed if we tell that person about our feelings.

Some of us have to realise that until we make a move, nothing will happen. You stare blankly at your mobile phone's screen. Her/his name and number written on the screen. You fingers smoothly drew closer to the green dial button on the left curvature of your screen. NO. NO. I shouldn't. What if she/he's busy? What if they find me annoying? And you cut to the home screen and switch off your mobile phone. PEOPLE. How can we assume that she's gonna cut the call if we never made the call?

To those that have managed to express their feelings and escape the valley of friendzones, congratulations. No, seriously. Friendzone is a horrible abyss. I've managed to actually express my feelings to my crush once. I was certain about my efforts, live or die trying. In the end, she admitted that she too have feelings for me. Stupid enough, I said that we shouldn't jump abruptly into a relationship, as it would throw both of our lives into chaos. C'mon guys, I was fourteen. 

Honestly, I'm not mocking anybody's crush in this mind-to-blog perception. This post isn't written to illustrate how hard you can get crushed by your crush nor to depict the struggles of having a crush. This is merely an advice to everyone out there who wake up, thinking that their crush will be theirs one day; you'll never get what you want if you don't go for it.

Go for that person. Tell that person that they're your world. 

A friend once told me, "you may be one person to the world, but you can also be the world to one person." 

Just another wild scribble,
TJ.

Somebody Has To Say It: Pendidikan Moral is a Extreme Prodigality

Hi readers. Been a while? Errrmm yeah. Well, writer's block kicked in and got me all fuzzy. Before we splash into the title of the post, I would like to thank all my readers and wish everyone a - late - Happy New Year. I would also like to apologise and promise to make some time to update my blog every now and then.

Somebody Has To Say It #1 : Pendidikan Moral is an Extreme Prodigality

Bold, some might say. I am actually expecting a lot of criticism and negative feedbacks towards my choice of post. I would like to clear the tension in the air and remind everybody that I do not intend to insult anybody but just expressing my perception.

To readers that aren't too familiar with Malaysia and the education system here, Pendidikan Moral is a subject taught to Standard One students and all the way to Form Five. So, basically a normal Malaysian student studying at a government school would study Pendidikan Moral for eleven years. For the first six years, the questions and syllabus are purely nothing but the science of logic and deduction. More of what would you do if you were there stuff.

Once you pave your way into Form One, students will scratch the heads and sigh loudly, wah? Or even a desperate what the heck sigh! Because it doesn't make any sense. Pendidikan Moral syllabus in  the secondary schools are divided into thirty-six chapters, each for a moral value. Such Kepercayaan Kepada Tuhan (Belief in God) being the first chapter. And each moral value consist of two three lines of exaggerated so-called definitions. To everyone questioning my opinion, how can I accept a general definition of a moral value when my accounts of the moral value are different? What if my definition of the value is different from what is stated? 

If so, isn't that the right method? Assessment should be based upon what the students think about the value and how they define the value. But, is that how it works? NO. The syllabus is meant to test students ability to remember thirty six exaggerated definitions, only for the students to forget what or how they think the value is. And apparently, even misplacing a word in the essay-looking definitions would earn no empathy from the marking scheme. The marking scheme cites it as an wrong answer. What the heck?

One should always remember that not everyone who aces Pendidikan Moral examination really have moral values and ethics in themselves and not everyone who doesn't ace his Moral examination doesn't have moral ethics.

To those readers who think I'm just a student who's complaining because I can't ace it, you're wrong and that's a horrible lie. I generally think it's just a pure prodigality if the examination syllabus doesn't change. Pendidikan Moral is an important subject, but for the moral values to be properly instilled in each student, remembering thirty six definitions is certainly not the way.

Before I rest my case, I would like to apologise to anyone who felt hurt, offended, unappreciated or exasperated by my views. I would like to insist that I am merely expressing my thoughts and views into words. Only words - not bitter insults. I am not condemning my alma mater, teachers nor students or even the syllabus. What you are reading - here - is nothing but me saying that what's being done is not efficient enough.

Thank you. 

 TJ.

Eureka bitches! The Science of Shower

"Everyone who's ever taken a shower has an idea. It's the person who gets out of the shower, dries off and does something about it that makes a difference." 

Nolan Bushnell.

You know you shouldn't be slacking off like this, a couch potato. Get up! It's way past twelve in the cloudy Saturday noon and you promised yourself that you will confront whatever that consumed half of your worries. Whether it was a homework accompanied with a deadline, a model that your teacher requires you to do or a presentation, you promised yourself that you will finish it, regardless of how nonsense your method is.

But there you are, slacking off. Wondering and worried, rather than putting your wasted thoughts into efforts. Maybe I need a clean start, a refreshment. A bath, precisely. Leaving the couch half-heartedly, you walked towards the cubicle-looking bathroom. Let's get started, your mind lied. You began to undress yourself, standing naked. Your fingers ran through the thermostat, turning the knob, every inch to right. Heat! 

In the shower, with the hot water coming down on yourself, thoughts begun it's way up into your mind. Thoughts led to ideas. Ideas led to problems. Problems seemed simple. You begun working up solutions. Creativity. Creative solutions. More ideas. Thoughts. Problems. Solution. A chain. A marvellous chain of wonders of thoughts. In a shower? 

Knock, knock! The Dark ages and the abnormally long Renaissance period have waded it's way through, yet we never really began accepting things that seem and deemed to be illogical right? To those who are reading this post out there, for your kind information and additional knowledge, bathroom is in fact the greatest studio that lets our thoughts and imaginations fly without borders nor restrictions.

Trust me, the occurrence of ideas isn't nearly a happenstance, but indeed a solid model of the renowned theory called "creative pause", first coined by Dr. Edward de Bono.

Creative pause is the easiest and the simplest method to enhance your brain's creative thinking ability. Creative pause is not a process of chained events that leads to creative solutions. There's a difference. Tadaaa, take it lazy buns! Creative pause is literally you clearing out every possible distractions in your head, including your sorrows, worries, disgust towards Kim Kardashian, dread for another burger and (especially) that Morgan Freeman voice that is narrating your life in your mind.

Brain Synapse

Science has given us some logical reasons why the Bathroom is the chamber that proves imaginations and thoughts. During showers, we are alone (some aren't, none of my problem), and that gives us a lot of space and time to reconsider events and thoughts that bothered us. With less or no distractions, our mind allows creative pause to take over, thus enabling the best of ideas to emerge.

While some of you geniuses might argue that the strong flowing of water accompanied with the sound it creates is indeed a distraction. Wrong! The subject of water is soft rather than distracting. The word water is synonymous to peace, calmness and quiet - the best conditions to enable creative pause to take over. The sound it makes is cited as white noise. White noise, similar to my previous point, is synonymous to calmness and helps mind to provoke creative thoughts easily.

And now the Award for the greatest idea ever discovered in the bathroom goes to ...

Archimedes!

Eureka bitches! 

Ever had your very own moment of genius in bathroom? Wish to share it? Tell me and I'll blog about it. Comment and follow, have fun.

TJ.

Conspiracy theories behind the death of Diana, Princess of Wales

Diana. Die-ana. Goodness sake, what am I writing here! I seriously apologize for my horrible sense of humour.

Diana, Princess of Wales, was always an icon and an inspiring woman through decades of her life. Her wedding to Charles, Prince of Wales, attracted seven hundred and fifty million global television audiences. Constrastingly, happy endings are only fairy tales aren't they? Diana and Charles' marriage came under much scrutinity after both ended up having affairs. Diana began her relationship with Major James Hewitt whilst Chales reignited his romances with his former girlfriend, Camilla Bowles. Both blamed each other for the collapse of their marriage. They eventually divorced on 28th of August on 1996.

Before leading up to core conspiracy theories, pay close attention to Diana's post-divorce life and pre-death. Diana eventually dated a heart surgeon, Hasnat Khan, but their romance ended in June 1997. Many of Diana's close friends cited that Hasnat was the love of her life. Later, she began her relationship with Dodi Fayed, son of her host that summer, Mohamed Al-Fayed.

Diana's Death

On 31st August 1997, Diana was involved in a car crash, which also took the lives of her love, Dodi Fayed and the driver, Henri Paul. The only lone survivor of the fatal crash was Trevor Rees-Jones, Diana's and Dodi Fayed's bodyguard. The crash took place at Pont de I'Alma road tunnel of Paris, France. The car was travelling on 105 kilometres per hour when it swerved to the left and crashed on the 13th pillar of the road tunnel. 13th? Whaadup numerology? The blamed was Henri Paul, who was consuming alcohol before the fatal incident. Blood samples found that he had been consuming three time more alcohol that the France driving alcohol limit. Okay, case solved! Or was it?

The Conspiracy Theories

Henri Paul was never drunk
To prove this one, you gotta find the world's greatest alcoholic person and give him the same amount of alcohol consumed by Henri Paul and see whether he looks sober. According to the French authorities', Henri Paul did consume alcohol, not bits but by a large volume. Contrastingly, the British pathologist hired by Al-Fayed reject the idea. Al-Fayed also claimed that the CCTV footage of Paul that evening didn't show any signs of him being sober.

Richard Tomlinson claiming MI6 was involved
Tomlinson was a former MI6 agent and was largely responsible to the rise of theories claiming Diana's death wasn't an accident. Tomlinson claimed that MI6 staged her death and was keeping tabs of her prior to the fatal accident. According to him, Diana's death mirrored the plans he saw in the 1992 for the assassination of President of Serbia, Slobodan Milošević. Operation Paget eventually found the memo that Tomlinson refers to, but it was a proposal to assassinate a different person, if he had rise to power, not Slobodan Milošević. He now lives in France as a professional pilot. Yes, lesson learnt. Don't screw up things with MI6.

Marriage with a Egyptian-Muslim Dodi Fayed
Prince Harry and Charles were definitely in line to succeed the throne during Diana's living days. According the claims, the idea of a future king's mother and a prominent Egyptian Muslim having engaged, married would not be "tolerated."

Diana was pregnant?
The mother of all theories. This is absurd fake. Al-Fayed's desperation to win the court was obvious here. Regardless of my opinions, I shall tell. Al-Fayed claimed that Diana was pregnant and she and Dodi Fayed were looking a new room for their baby at the villa owned by Al-Fayed at Paris. He continued that they were there for at least two hours and were in the company of an Italian interior designer. A security guard working at the villa, Murrell felt uncomfortable about lying and proceed to handover the CCTV footages of the villa during the couple's visit. He also admitted that their visit barely lasted 30 minutes and there wasn't any Italian interior designer accompanying them. Murrell resigned whilst Al-Fayed sued him for breach of contract for handing over the CCTV footages.

There are though many other conspiracy theories surrounding this, such Diana being a faithful seat belt user, so why didn't she wore them? Why did the hospital authorities rushed to embalm Diana's body? Was a Fiat White Uno involved in the crash?

I grew up to my mum telling my stories that MI6 killed Diana and I was always fascinated with all this theories. Tell me what you think and what other conspiracy theories always fascinated you in the comments section below.

TJ.

The Amazing Spider-Man 2 and why Carrie White and girls nowadays are synonymous?

Seriously? Who allowed Marc Webb to even certify Andrew Garfield's Spider-Man as the amazing one?

Though, I must say, the trailer for The Amazing Spider-Man 2 was equally impressive to what Sony and Marc Webb promised. So, people, let's draw our attention to things we learnt from The Amazing (not-so) Spider-Man 2 trailer.

One, we got ourselves three villains, super-villains, apparently, because one isn't enough. Introducing Electro, a bluish monster, who overdosed blue detergent. Electro was introduced in a teaser, way before the official film teaser debuted. Jamie Foxx of Django Unchained portrays Electro, who was Max Dillon, an engineer who worked at Oscorp Industries. Next, Rhino. Who the heck is Rhino? Apparently, Rhino is a Russian mob, Aldkfjifeff Sdsidn. Yes, that's a Russian name. However Rhino of The Amazing Spider-Man 2 is artificial, machine made. What's up Transformers references. Finally, our classic friend, Harry Oscorp, with a horrible hairstyle this time.

Two, Oscorp Industries has been a bad bad boy. This whole film revolves around Oscorp Industries apparently, even establishment of Electro and Green Goblin's characters comes from Oscorp. One element that separates Sam Raimi's trilogy from this is the involvement of Richard Parker's dark past with Oscorp. With the aid of Harry, Peter managed to find, bit by bit, the secrets that should be left buried.

Three, Harry will be paying less attention to Gwen Stacy. Nooooooooooooooooo! Emmmaaaa Stonneeeee. Alright, I feel you guys. It's almost a cliche where the superhero has to sacrifice portions of his attention for his love while trying to save the innocent citizens of New York City.

Four, New York is getting smashed into pieces again. Seriously? Aren't there anyone out there who is getting tired of superheroes smashing through the whole city just to save a few citizens?

Continuing.

Why is Carrie White almost identical to girls nowadays? Well, they share the same things.

Bullying. Pressure she faces. Her annoying mother. Blood. And relentless hate and disgust towards innocent menstrual cycle.

TJ.